(2000) and Hagedoorn (2002) concluded that there was a lack of research into transfer channels other than commercialization. 1998; Santoro and Gopalakrishnan 2001). 22(7), 597624. Workplace mobility of employees during and after the collaboration seems the best way to transfer and implement (tacit) knowledge, while these employees also act as intermediaries to align goals. hbbd``b` S` bH"VU H0qGk^L,[AF10C{@ $
It is noted that FinTech is in its nascent phase and is undergoing continuous development and implementation through product and process innovation, disruption and transformation. It is therefore much welcomed, that since 2013 more research has been conducted into how institutional differences influence knowledge transfer and collaboration success. Morandi, V. (2013). (1999). Background: PDF The U.S. Charter School Landscape: Extant Literature, Gaps in Research =FHu$ktrksWw=SA>=TAecWvpXd$84*]vS Goals and outcomes should be established early in the project. Review methods: Qualitative research in this field is often very descriptive and does not refer to theoretical concepts. %%EOF
Communication is an important facilitator to improve absorptive capacity. To align goals, projects often start with a project plan, which allocates tasks and responsibilities and milestones in detail (Barnes et al. Hagedoorn, J. Aim: Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on universityindustry relations. What does extant literature mean? - Definitions.net The risk in this kind of work is that projects deviate from original plans, or that changes in plans are not well administrated and lead to discussion later on. Ankrah, S., & AL-Tabbaa, O. Trust also influences the contractual and organizational management of the collaboration. Trust is positively influenced by tie strength and shared goals, and negatively by ambiguity and organizational differences. They sketch a much more dynamic exchange process, in which the industrial application of research outcomes directly influences academic research. Collaborations involving mutually dependent research form an exceptions, these plans are more likely to be updated to coordinate activities (Morandi 2013). A good understanding of a partners needs helps to take these needs into account, also when novel directions are pursued, while open communication raises understanding. This paper identifies practices that can facilitate knowledge transfer in universityindustry (UI) research partnerships by systematically reviewing extant literature. In adopting this focus we follow a developing interest in organization science that seeks a detailed understanding of what is actually done, or the micro-level, and how to make sense of those activities (Nicolini 2009). Academy of Management Journal, R&D Management, The review remains an ongo- 2010). We started our review with identifying barriers and facilitators . 23(5), 487521. Technovation, There remains uncertainty over the relevance of experience and management capabilities to solve transfer problems related to knowledge differences. Use the Previous and Next buttons to navigate the slides or the slide controller buttons at the end to navigate through each slide. Canhoto, A. I., Quinton, S., Jackson, P., & Dibb, S. (2016). In our view, an increased understanding of when informal or formal management mechanisms are used is needed. In the same study, tacitness and explicitness (related to knowledge ambiguity) moderated knowledge transfer negatively. The relevance of ambiguity and absorptive capacity in the context of UI collaboration was confirmed by Santoro and Bierly (2006). 0000019218 00000 n
We also found that the current literature is focussed on the responsibilities and perception of the academic partner, with very limited attention for the role of the industrial partner. Information and translations of extant literature in the most comprehensive dictionary definitions resource on the web. This may conflict with making strict project plans and specifying deliverables that align with industrial needs. Also, providing the industrial partner the possibility to delay the publication to arrange IP rights reduces this barrier (Hadjimanolis 2006). 19(1), 3140. Bjerregaard, T. (2009). Close interaction is also the most important way for researchers to identify interesting questions for future research (Perkmann and Walsh 2007; Ulhi et al. 2011; Morandi 2013). Publication management includes arrangements regarding what data can be published and allows the industrial partner to authorize publication, this ensure academics do not publish sensitive knowledge (Azevedo Ferreira and Rezende Ramos 2015). 18(3), 282306. Second, we excluded papers that were not related to knowledge transfer. J Clin Nurs. 13(4), 287299. the review is being conducted. 10(1), 6588. 19(5), 461477. This paper describes the history and current state of the charter school movement, presents a conceptual model of the charter school system, and reviews the extant research on charter school outcomes. European Journal of Innovation Management, Bjerregaard (2010) and Bruneel et al. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2014; Wang and Lu 2007) and the use of tools or objects (Buganza et al. Trust results in less formal contractual agreements (Chin et al. Journal of Management Studies, (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering. 37 No. University-to-industry knowledge transfer: Literature review and unanswered questions. Higher Education Research and Development, Such knowledge is often transferred through contractual agreements, like patents (Alexander and Childe 2013; Sandberg et al. Extant. Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/extant. This can lead to confusion when university partners have several senior researchers, and it is unclear who is in control (Barnes et al. There remains discussion about the extent to which cultural differences actually affect collaboration in practice. Zhu, F., & Hawk, S. (2015). The open and interactive mode of communication in this kind of meetings gives industrial partners the possibility to engage more and feel more comfortable about giving input (McCabe et al. This paper describes the history and current state of the charter school movement, presents a conceptual model of the charter school system, and reviews the extant research on charter school . 2015). 0000189372 00000 n
This discrepancy is partly explained by McCabe et al. We found that cognitive differences are hard to overcome without the presences of boundary spanners or intermediaries. (2006). This requires the investment of time to develop a shared language and discourse (Al-Tabbaa and Ankrah 2016; Canhoto et al. The results from the Boolean search from the three literature databases were combined in Rayyan (Ouzzani et al. Academy of Management Journal, Social capital is built through frequent face-to-face communication and workshops that facilitate interaction (Al-Tabbaa and Ankrah 2016; Plewa et al. We used the following academic databases: Emerald, Web of Knowledge and Business Source Premier. The most important characteristic of knowledge is its explicitness (Santoro and Bierly 2006). Knowledge transfer practices are then defined as the activities that facilitate what is needed to bring knowledge into use in another organizations context, such as, teaching, the management of interactions and sharing data and technology. 2013b). 37(7), 10191044. Correspondence to Academy of Management Journal, Thune, T. (2009). Achieving effectiveness involves a combination of specific knowledge or expertise vis-a-vis substantive law, institutional process, and other actors in the system. Rethinking the relationship between academia and industry: Qualitative case studies of MIT and Stanford. 2002; Gertner et al. 2011; Harryson et al. financial industry, innovation/technology and law/regulation. This can result in more ambiguity and less trust in that the partner will do what is right for you. Bercovitz, J., & Feldmann, M. (2006). These suggestions are based on open questions we encountered during our analysis and inconsistencies between the results in the papers discussed here. You may adopt conventional methods, including phenomenological research, narrative-based research, grounded theory research, ethnographies , case studies, and auto-ethnographies. (2013), but we did not find relevant papers in this period. 2013a; Pinheiro et al. This includes identifying gaps in the extant literature. Following previous research in the field of UI research (for example Perkmann et al. Extant literature and extant music refers to texts or music that has survived from the past to the present time, as opposed to lost work. 0000189524 00000 n
2013b). The ease with which knowledge is transferred depends on the characteristics of knowledge, similarities in knowledge background and knowledge management capabilities. Why do academics engage with industry? Over the past decades, research into academic engagement increased. 2014; Wang and Lu 2007). Login Social capital to facilitate engineered universityindustry collaboration for technology transfer: A dynamic perspective. Moreover, 11 studies used extant literature and 1 study extracted data from a focus group discussion. Consistent with the breadth of our research question, we adopt an inductive approach using techniques borrowed from grounded theory (Wolfswinkel et al., 2013) and review 282 works on DT culled from IS literature. We therefore invite scholars to conduct more research into the relationships we proposed in our model. 0000000956 00000 n
This helps to integrate the results of the research (McCabe et al. 46(2), 369382. Based on the review, avenues for future research studies are outlined.,The review of extant literature reveals that several SMA techniques such as competitor accounting, strategic pricing, benchmarking and customer accounting have been highly or moderately adopted in several developed countries while majority of other techniques remained at the . Zhu and Hawk (2015) show how academics at Stanford University and MIT (Michigan Institute for Technology) managed to maintain their academic freedom. Academicpractitioner collaboration in management research: A case of cross-profession collaboration. Buganza, T., Colombo, G., & Landoni, P. (2014). International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 2013b; Steinmo 2015). The management of industryuniversity joint research projects: How do partners coordinate and control R&D activities? The second important factor that influences knowledge absorption, is differences in knowledge background, referred to as cognitive and epistemic difference. 0000135631 00000 n
PDF Writing the literature review for empirical papers - Semantic Scholar 1, pp. The second, with differences in goals and the applicability of knowledge. Cultural differences relating to the application of knowledge and willingness to share knowledge relates to the academic habit to publish results, while industrial partners rather keep knowledge secret. 2013b; Ulhi et al. Using a synthesised technique for grounded theory in nursing research. Collaboration for innovation: A case study on how social capital mitigates collaborative challenges in universityindustry research alliances. ^,O^bT RaJqlxar7[Kpk['fr Lg!&W$~$UU2bOxr}!a)F@~P^._Up/DQ0@xl9mGBF)%2?81S
GC+- Plewa, C., Korff, N., Johnson, C., Macpherson, G., Baaken, T., & Rampersad, G. C. (2013b). (PDF) Understanding the concept of knowledge gap and knowledge 555 Broadway, Dobbs Ferry, NY 10522. The extent to which cultural differences affect academic engagement is unclear, even as the role of experience to reduce this barrier. From these results we selected papers that could help us answer the following research questions: What is known about knowledge transfer in academic engagement according to the extant literature. European Journal of Innovation Management, 2016). We noticed that three reoccurring practices are important for rich communication practices: boundary spanners (Al-Tabbaa and Ankrah 2016; Barnes et al. Production Planning and Control, This thematic paper divides FinTech into three themes, i.e. Mercy College New York. (2004). Daghfous, A. STANDS4 LLC, 2023. 2007; Wang and Lu 2007). In the following part we will discuss the findings from the literature we reviewed. Partha, D., & David, P. A. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Accessed 1 May. There were only six journals in which we found more than 1 paper, three of those had published two papers and three published three papers. 163 0 obj <>
endobj
Research partnerships. Collaborative research programmes: Building trust from difference. More attention for how firms manage research partnerships is therefore needed. Administrative Science Quarterly, Previous reviews by Agrawal (2001), Hagedoorn et al. Jbqv+ ;:ab Instead of limiting our search to a list of prominent journals we decided to include a wide range of economic and managerial literature. Additionally, trust is reflected in the absence of formal control mechanisms. 2013a). Cultural differences and differences in goals were also identified by van Wijk et al. 2016). r.+IT8&"C0\&nnaxd)T{U`A ;CZpJ[D\V=!'8Pb666hr|DDJ9BJJ@ ]SA BlfFpR@p$^Bs0dsw.YHv TBu#P5 UAAl[;Et9`VM g5tyo/0?`P`C iL+=`YiJ}
*Kt wF#}
"'914F^RHKy,*\rVg'p>c\rZDrYU,YX:g0pJ@vB-y` J
Extensive Research Article Reviews Samples For Students - WOWEssays.com 35(1), 128152. The role of relational trust in banksmall firm relationships. [Challenges of the grounded theory approach to a novice researcher]. Strategic Management Journal, hb```nK>c`0pl 323)e.bg?(`rPOd?3;>_#gppIfs.y:00nII.C!
l
,@~+Dd7 n1H Thereafter, it identifies the gaps and provides directions for further research. 2015). Effective universityindustry interaction: A multi-case evaluation of collaborative R&D projects. We have provided experience-based information in . The channels for communication during engagement are diverse and differ in their ability to transfer tacit knowledge and to deal with differences in knowledge backgrounds (Alexander and Childe 2013). Resultantly, academic reputation and previous personal ties are important drivers for establishing collaborations (Pinheiro et al. While the need to publish might be at odds with the need to protect sensitive company knowledge and hamper trust. Institutional factors are cultural differences and shared goals. 2013b). We also identified the most relevant factors and practices for the mitigation of these differences.